duplication of rules
7.8.3 I am having a weird thing happen. When i go into an existing rule, change the rule label, and save the settings when i go back to the device specific screen the rule has duplicated itself. I now have the rule before modification and a new rule with the rule label changed. The unique id for the rule is the same for each. Is this some weird caching issue? It seems to only happen in firefox.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
An other similar problem i have: when i changed a rule, it could be missing or overwrite an other rule in the same device... then i see the changed rule twice and the other rule is deleted. i checked this also in the conf files..
my workaround in the moment is, to configure all settings in the .conf file on the server directly...
please explain step by step what you did as we could not replicate the way we understood it.
1. Upgraded to 7.8.3.
2. rebooted serverscheck server.
3. logged into dashboard from remote machine running firefox 2.0.0.9.
4. select a device I need to modify.
5. in the device screen, I click the label for the rule i want to modify.
6. modify the values
7. Save the rule
8. Back in the device page it shows two of the same rules both with a green check mark values under the checks column.
9. I delete the duplicate rule and the device pages show the single rule without a green check mark and 0 value listed in the check column.
10. i click the label for the rule and then just save the rule again and it creates another duplicate rule.
11. I delete both duplicate rules and recreate the rule fresh trough the wizard and all is fine. no duplicates.
The issue is intermittent.
If you have a support agreement, then please login into the online helpdesk and provide following to the support team as this will help us in better understanding the issue:
1/ Word document which screen shotsof each step from 3 until 11
2/ Attach your serverscheck.conf; devices.conf and groups.conf file in the message
Thank you
A fix has been posted on following url:
http://files.serverscheck.net/fixes/s-server.zip
It will be part of the forthcoming 7.8.4 release
should i send pictures to the support too?
Have you already checked it with the new patch? is it ok now?
Also make sure to send your serverscheck.conf; groups.conf and devices.conf file
Support, I have another video documentating the problem if you would like to download it.
Gabriel
gmillerarmt & bedee: we tried the examples you sent us and it did not occur on this latest build.
You can download the latest build from here:
http://files.serverscheck.net/fixes/s-server.zip
*UPDATE* we have been informed that there might some other issues regarding this test build. As it is a test build, we recommend not to put it into production prior to testing.
Help. Do you think replacing the s-server.exe with the original 7.8.3 one will return me to my previous state? Or am i going to have to go to backup?
Send your serverscheck.conf file to the helpdesk. We will look at it.
It is 11:50pm here in Europe and we are still with a few people left to work on the duplicate rules issue but first assessment is that one has nothing to do with the other as explained above.
Here is what happens: when adding a new rule the first 5 lines of the conf file are messed up. These lines contain email settings and admin login details. Copy the 5 first lines from the serverscheck.conf file and it should be OK again
I have copied back the original to the release 7.8.3 s-server.exe.
I understand that’s its late and really appreciate you staying on so late. I, unfortunately, cannot stay as late. Let’s pick this up in the morning.
http://files.serverscheck.net/fixes/s-server.zip
We also did send you a fixed version of your serverscheck.conf file including your original settings from a backup you sent us.
I used the conf file that you sent along, thank you. I had to reenter the password for the user entries in the "windows user credentials" in order for the checks to come out of the down state. I was receiving an "Access Denied" before reentering the password.
I created a new alert rule and all seems fine.
Thank You...
i also tested the new patch in serveral situations. It looks fine!
Thanks a lot to all engineers for looking so fast at all problems, which i (we) reported to you in this forum. you'r doing a excellent job!!
Thanks!