email alert

kanghongkanghong
edited February 2009 in Monitoring Software v12 and lower
Dear Admin



the email alert sent out from the serverscheck appliance is blank , it without any sender / subject and the message is blank . kindly refer below for the email header



Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMO[email protected]>

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mailsvr

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=15.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,EMPTY_MESSAGE,

MISSING_SUBJECT,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=failed version=3.1.7

Received: from serverscheck.com ([192.168.21.9])

by abc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n1N8Lm4M023967

for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:21:55 +0800

Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:21:48 +0800

Message-Id: <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

X-Priority: 1

Priority: Urgent

Subject:

X-UIDL: p=A!!AL7!!E/+!!NoU!!

Comments

  • AdministratorAdministrator
    What is the first line of your serverscheck.conf file?
  • kanghongkanghong
    Here we go ..



    GRAPHS:

    HTML:true

    SETTINGS:administrator<X>53616c7465645f5fe6cd804b5dfba0c86b2f33cb7668a5f801724877c46f0227<X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X>

    # checktype|X|check label|X|retries|X|check interval in seconds|X|email alert to|X|network message to|X|sms alert to|X|fail on up/down|X|fail on value1|X|operand|X|target value1|X|fail on value2|X|operand|X|target value2|X|check definition|X|Time intervals When not to check|X|minimum service level in %|X|active|X|

    SETTINGS:<X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X><X>

    PING|X|12342578301437|X|3|X|180|X||X||X||X|true|X|true|X|lt|X|5|X||X||X||X|1.1.1.1<X>|X||X|98|X|yes|X|180|X||X||X|On each status change|X||X||X||X||X||X|<X>|X||X|yes|X|<X><X><X>|X|<X><X>|X||X||X|no|X||X||X||X|ABC WebServer|X|false|X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X||X|<X>|X||X||X||X||X|PING|X|<X><X><X><X><X><X>|X||X||X|
  • AdministratorAdministrator
    Your conf file got corrupt - follow procedure as in this thread:

    http://www.serverscheck.com/forum/display_topic_threads.asp?ForumID=1&TopicID=1211&PagePosition=1
This discussion has been closed.